What does INNOVATE GERMANY look for in general?

Projects submitted to INNOVATE GERMANY are evaluated by national and international jury members using the criteria below. Each project is assessed holistically, taking into account originality, scientific rigor, and real-world relevance.


Scientific Approach & Methodology

Judges evaluate whether the project demonstrates a clear and structured research approach.

Key questions include:

  • Is the research problem or objective clearly defined?
  • Is the project testable, measurable, or systematically developed?
  • Are variables, controls, or design parameters clearly identified (where applicable)?
  • Is the methodology appropriate for the chosen category?

Creativity & Innovation

Innovation is at the heart of INNOVATE GERMANY.

Judges consider:

  • Does the project present an original idea or a novel approach?
  • Is the solution creative and distinct from existing methods or products?
  • Does the project go beyond standard or expected solutions?

Research Depth & Data Quality

Strong projects are supported by solid evidence.This may differ for Junior or Senior categories.

Judges look for:

  • A systematic and well-documented research process
  • Conclusions that are clearly supported by data, testing, or analysis
  • Appropriate use of results, observations, or performance metrics
  • Evidence of consistent progress (e.g. project journal or development log)

Technical Skill & Independent Work

Projects should reflect the student’s own effort and technical understanding.

Evaluation includes:

  • Level of technical skill demonstrated
  • Evidence that the project was developed primarily by the student(s)
  • Proper acknowledgment of any external assistance, mentorship, or tools used
  • Ethical and transparent use of technology, including AI

Real-World Relevance & Impact

INNOVATE GERMANY values projects that address meaningful challenges.

Judges assess:

  • Does the project respond to real-world problems in science, engineering, technology, or the environment?
  • Does it demonstrate awareness of sustainability, ethics, or societal benefit?
  • Could the project have practical applications or future potential?